# Dyspute.ai

Aiolum story: https://aiolum.com/story/dyspute/ · added 2026-11-05 · updated 2026-11-06

**In short.** Dyspute.ai (AI mediator and dispute letters, USA): 14 paying customers, January 2025. Evidence grade E: no revenue figure was checked. Team: 2 co-founders and a CTO, with advisors; headcount not published. Launched June 2024; still running.

AI mediator and dispute letters · USA · AI-native · team of 2 to 10 · still running · group: Legal and law firms

- Outcome: 14 paying customers, January 2025 (evidence grade of the headline number: E; no revenue figure)
- Launch: June 2024; months from launch to the outcome: 7
- Team: 2 co-founders and a CTO, with advisors; headcount not published
- Outside funding: Bootstrapped; a US$5,000 pitch prize from BubbleCon 2024
- Main factor: Domain expertise
- Meters, 1 to 4: evidence strength 1, copyable pattern 2, capital needed 1
- Tags: AI-native, Small team, Bootstrapped, Running, B2B, Legal

Links:

- Visit dyspute.ai: https://dyspute.ai/

**The product.** An online mediation service in which an AI mediator named Adri runs the whole process in text chat: a separate intake with each party, settlement proposals, offers, and a settlement agreement to sign. The same platform writes demand letters and responses to them. Parties can use it directly, and mediation providers can use it with a human watching each case from a dashboard.

**Why it worked.** The founder, a lawyer who teaches negotiation, said that mediation works but is expensive and tied to office hours and calendars. Adri lets both sides answer at different times, and it makes the first proposal itself. The company then moved its focus from consumers to mediation providers that want a cheap first step for small disputes.

Evidence grades: A = disclosed by a public company, a filing or a payment processor, or verified by one; B = two or more independent reports agree, or a journalist confirmed it; C = a founder claim that no one else verified; D = reported, not verified: one founder claim or a third-party estimate with no second source; E = no revenue figure found, so the headline is a non-money fact and the other facts carry their own grades; calc = computed on this page from graded facts.

## Summary

Dyspute.ai sells mediation, a process in which a neutral third person helps two sides in a dispute reach an agreement but does not decide the case, run by an AI. Its mediator, Adri, works asynchronously: the parties do not need to be online at the same time, and the platform sends a notification when it is someone's turn. It also writes demand letters, formal letters that state a claim and ask the other side to pay or act before a dispute goes further.

Renee Jackson, a former in-house lawyer at Zynga, Splunk and Wish, founded it on 17 March 2024 in Dover, New Hampshire, with her long-time colleague Frank Goldberg as co-founder and COO. The demand letter generator launched in June 2024, a first AI mediator in beta in March 2025, and a fully rebuilt version 2 in January 2026. In January 2025 the company reported 14 paying customers and more than 1,100 active users on the LawNext Startup Alley ballot.

No revenue figure has been published, so this page is grade E: it records a real business and its prices, not its income. The page also shows what happened to earlier companies that tried to make legal work cheaper with software.

## Pricing

Dyspute.ai prices read on its own pricing pages, 5 November 2026 (grade C)

| Plan | Per month, billed yearly (US$) | Per month, billed monthly (US$) | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Mediation with Adri | 299 per mediation |  | 15 proposals over 7 days, basic settlement agreement included |
| Extra proposals (add-on) | 29 per add-on |  | 5 more proposals |
| Extra time (add-on) | 29 per add-on |  | 72 more hours |
| Demand letter, Download & Go | 29 per letter |  | Word file, you send it |
| Demand letter, Revise & Sign | 49 per letter |  | AI-assisted editing, e-signature, PDF |
| Demand letter, Finalize & Send | 69 per letter |  | delivery and tracking through the platform |
| Settlement agreement, Sign & Go | 49 per agreement |  | limited editing, e-signatures |
| Settlement agreement, Revise & Sign | 69 per agreement |  | full editing and version control |
| Enterprise Flex | pay per product |  | 3 seats, mediation caps apply |
| Enterprise Growth |  | 999 | 5 seats, up to 25 active cases a month |
| Enterprise Premium |  | 1,999 | 10 seats, up to 100 active cases a month |
| Enterprise | custom |  | API, white label, SLA |

Mediation, letters and agreements are paid per case or per document, not by subscription. The mediation fee is due only after both parties finish intake. Settlement payments run through Stripe, and the customer pays Stripe's fees plus a US$10 convenience fee. The Growth and Premium plans are monthly subscriptions for companies and mediation providers; the page does not show a yearly price.

## How much revenue does Dyspute.ai make? The numbers, graded

A two-founder legal AI company with published prices and a small, self-reported customer count; no revenue figure

| Fact | Value | Grade | Note | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paying customers, January 2025 | 14 | C | Company's own ballot entry, published by LawNext on 9 January 2025: 'Early traction includes 14 paying customers, primarily in property- and workplace-related disputes.' At that time only the demand letter generator was live. | [1] |
| Users and visitors since launch, January 2025 | more than 1,100 active users; more than 14,000 website visitors | C | Same ballot entry. Not checked by anyone outside the company. | [1] |
| Revenue | not published | E | No revenue figure was found in the ballot, the press coverage or the company's pages. | [1, 2] |
| Founded and location | 17 March 2024; fully remote, headquarters in Dover, New Hampshire | C | Ballot entry. The company is Dyspute Inc. | [1, 4] |
| Team | Founder and CEO Renee Jackson, co-founder and COO Frank Goldberg, a CTO, and advisors | C | Team page and ballot. Both founders are former lawyers at Nixon Peabody and Cooley who worked together at Zynga and Wish. The CTO is not named. No headcount is published. | [5, 1] |
| Outside funding | none reported | C | Ballot, January 2025: the company had met four venture investors but planned 'to remain bootstrapped through at least 2025'. It won a US$5,000 prize at BubbleCon's Demo Day in October 2024. No later source reports a round. | [1, 12] |
| Mediation price, January 2025 and January 2026 | free if not resolved, US$100 if resolved; then US$299 per mediation | C | The ballot gave the first model. LawSites reported the US$299 base price at the version 2 launch, and the pricing page still shows it. | [1, 2, 6] |
| AI models | OpenAI and Gemini for Google Cloud, through their APIs | C | Company FAQ: 'We currently use LLMs from OpenAI and Gemini for Google Cloud.' The FAQ says API access means user data is not used to train the models. | [10] |
| How it was built | a no-code beta, then a full rebuild in code for version 2 | C | Renee Jackson told LawSites in January 2026 that the beta was built on a no-code platform to test quickly and that version 2 was rebuilt from scratch. The beta came out of Bubble's Immerse accelerator in 2024. | [2, 12] |
| Target disputes | two-party disputes under US$25,000 | C | Founder to LawSites: small claims cases and many employer-employee disputes. | [2] |
| Time from launch to the headline figure | 7 months | calc | Calculated: June 2024 (demand letter generator) to January 2025 (ballot). | [1] |

How to read this table: a grade C value is a statement by the company, on its own pages or to a journalist. A grade E row marks a figure that was looked for and not found. An "X" value was computed on this page.

## When did Dyspute.ai launch, and how did it grow? Timeline

From a demand letter generator in June 2024 to a rebuilt AI mediator sold to mediation providers in 2026. Each entry carries its grade.

- **17 March 2024** (grade C [1, 17]): Dyspute.ai is founded. Jackson wrote that an article on AI in negotiations, read that month, gave her the idea.
- **June 2024** (grade C [1]): The AI demand letter generator launches, used by consumers and by lawyers.
- **August to October 2024** (grade C [12]): Selected for Bubble's Immerse Impact accelerator; wins the US$5,000 grand prize at BubbleCon's Demo Day with an early demo of Adri.
- **9 January 2025** (grade C [1]): LawNext publishes the company's Startup Alley entry: 14 paying customers, more than 1,100 active users, and a plan to stay bootstrapped.
- **12 March 2025** (grade C [12, 16]): Adri, the AI mediator, opens in beta.
- **13 January 2026** (grade C [2, 3]): Adri version 2, rebuilt in code, launches at US$299 per mediation, with partnerships with 9to5 Docs and New Era ADR. LawSites and Pulse 2.0 cover it.
- **June to July 2026** (grade C [12]): Platinum sponsor of ODR Forum 2026; the mediation provider dashboard becomes a case management system.

## Why did Dyspute.ai work?

### Founders who know the work

Both founders spent their careers handling disputes as lawyers, and the founder teaches negotiation. The product copies a known mediation method, the mediator's proposal, and the company says Adri is instructed on the published ethics standards for mediators.

### Asynchronous by default

Each side talks to Adri alone and answers when it suits them. The platform moves the case forward by notifications, so no calendar or meeting room is needed, and a case has a fixed limit of 15 proposals over 7 days.

### Sell to the people who already sell mediation

The founder told LawSites that the best first customers are mediation providers, such as community mediation centers, that cannot find enough human mediators for small cases. They get a dashboard and can step into a stalled case. A contract template company, 9to5 Docs, names Dyspute.ai as the default first step in its agreements.

## How it was built

These details come from the company's own pages and from the founder's interview with LawSites. They are grade C.

- The first version was built on a no-code platform during Bubble's Immerse accelerator in 2024, to test the idea quickly.
- Version 2, launched in January 2026, was rebuilt from scratch in code after feedback from beta users.
- Adri runs on large language models from OpenAI and Gemini for Google Cloud, accessed through their APIs.
- Signatures on letters and agreements use DocuSeal; settlement payments run through Stripe.
- Adri filters abusive language before it reaches the other party, and the company says it is instructed not to consider demographic or income information.

Sources: [2, 10, 7, 6, 4]

## Who tried this before Dyspute.ai, and why did they fail?

Three companies in our database of failed startups tried to make legal work or disputes cheaper with software. The values below are from that database and are not independently verified.

The failed startups come from our database of dead startups, retold here in our own words; Its entries are AI-assisted summaries of public sources, so they carry no evidence grade.

### Atrium (2017 to 2021; funding US$75M; cause: Product/Tech Failure)

- Promise: A technology-driven law firm for startups: faster, cheaper and more predictable legal work.
- Why it died: Its automation could not handle real legal complexity, so it carried the costs of a law firm without the quality.
- Record: 

### Fixed (2014 to 2017; funding US$1.8M; cause: Legal/Regulatory)

- Promise: Contest parking tickets from a phone, with a fee only when the ticket was reduced.
- Why it died: Cities resisted a third party in their dispute process, and each new city meant new rules.
- Record: 

### ROSS Intelligence (2015 to 2018; funding US$13M; cause: Competition)

- Promise: AI legal research that finds the relevant case law faster than the old databases.
- Why it died: Lawyers stayed with the established research databases, and the incumbents added AI themselves.
- Record: 

## What changed

All three tried to do legal work with software when the software could not read and write ordinary language well. Fixed also depended on a third party, the cities, accepting it in their process. Large language models now handle the text part: intake chats, summaries, letters and agreements.

Dyspute.ai also avoids two of their problems by design. It does not claim to give legal advice or to decide anything, since both parties must accept a settlement, and it sells to mediation providers instead of competing with them. Whether that is enough for a lasting business is not yet shown by any public number.

## Can one person copy Dyspute.ai now?

**Verdict: Partly: the method yes, the credibility no.**

The software is a sequence of chats, summaries and documents around a language model, and a small team built the first version on a no-code platform. What a newcomer cannot copy quickly is the founders' legal background, which gives mediation providers and the legal press a reason to trust an AI mediator.

1. Pick a professional process with a known written method, here the mediator's proposal, and turn each step into a guided chat.
2. Build the first version on a no-code platform and rebuild in code only after users have tested it.
3. Charge per case and only after both sides have joined, so that the price is low for a small dispute.
4. Sell to the organizations that already run the process and lack people, and give them a dashboard to supervise.

**What is still open.** Other small, high-volume disputes that rarely reach a professional: deposits, invoices, neighbor and contractor disagreements, and the first step written into standard contracts.

## What could go wrong for Dyspute.ai?

- **What is not verified.** No revenue figure was found. The only traction figures, 14 paying customers and more than 1,100 active users, are the company's own statements on a contest ballot published on 9 January 2025, before the AI mediator launched. No payment-processor profile, filing or later customer count was found. A reader could look for an updated customer or case count from the company, or for a mediation provider that names its use of Adri.
- **Legal status of AI mediation.** The site offers fully automated mediation (Adri only) directly to parties as well as human-supervised mediation. Its footer says 'Dyspute Inc. is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice', and its terms say all AI outputs 'DO NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE OR THE PRACTICE OF LAW, AND SHOULD BE INDEPENDENTLY EVALUATED BY LICENSED COUNSEL'. The company self-certifies compliance with ICODR online dispute resolution standards and mediator ethics codes; no outside certification of Adri as a mediator was found. Its FAQ states that communications are protected by mediation privilege 'under applicable law', a point that depends on each state's law and was not checked here. The company's own blog discusses the US Federal Trade Commission's decision against DoNotPay and the June 2026 amendment of the EU AI Act.
- **Competition and a closed peer.** LawSites names other online dispute resolution companies, Bot Mediation, Immediation and New Era ADR, and notes that the American Arbitration Association launched an AI arbitrator for construction disputes. The company's blog reports that FairClaims, an online dispute resolution company of about ten years, closed on 27 February 2026.
- **Dependence on model providers.** Adri, the letters and the agreements all run on models from OpenAI and Google, according to the FAQ. A price change, a policy change or a quality change at either provider affects every product, and the company's promise that user data is not used for training rests on those providers' API terms.

## Sources

1. LawNext (Robert Ambrogi), 9 January 2025: Voting Is Now Open: Pick the 15 Finalists to Compete at Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2025 — https://www.lawnext.com/2025/01/voting-is-now-open-pick-the-15-finalists-to-compete-at-startup-alley-at-aba-techshow-2025-in-april.html (grade C). Read the Dyspute.ai entry, written by the company. Source for the founding date, location, customer and user counts, early prices and funding plans. Downloaded 5 November 2026.
2. LawSites (Bob Ambrogi), 13 January 2026: Dyspute.ai Launches Adri v2, A 24/7 Asynchronous AI Mediation Platform — https://www.lawnext.com/2026/01/dyspute-ai-launches-adri-v2-a-24-7-asynchronous-ai-mediation-platform.html (grade C). Read in full. A journalist's interview with the founder. Source for the rebuild, the price, the shift to mediation providers, the partnerships and the competitors.
3. Pulse 2.0, January 2026: Dyspute.ai Launches Adri V2, A 24/7 Asynchronous AI Mediation Platform — https://pulse2.com/dyspute-ai-adri-v2/ (grade C). Read in full. Based on the company's announcement; confirms the launch date, Stripe payments and the partnerships.
4. Dyspute.ai home page — https://dyspute.ai/ (grade C). Read in full, 5 November 2026. Source for the fully automated and human-in-the-loop services, the legal-advice disclaimer and the ICODR self-certification.
5. Dyspute.ai team page — https://dyspute.ai/team (grade C). Read in full. Source for the founders' backgrounds and the Adri description.
6. Dyspute.ai AI mediation pricing — https://dyspute.ai/mediation (grade C). Read in full. Mediation price and add-ons.
7. Dyspute.ai demand letter pricing — https://dyspute.ai/demand-letters (grade C). Read in full. Letter prices and the DocuSeal signature feature.
8. Dyspute.ai settlement agreement pricing — https://dyspute.ai/settlement-agreements (grade C). Read in full.
9. Dyspute.ai enterprise solutions — https://dyspute.ai/enterprise-solutions (grade C). Read in full. Subscription plans for companies and mediation providers.
10. Dyspute.ai FAQs — https://dyspute.ai/faqs (grade C). Read in full. Source for the AI models, data use, mediation privilege and legal binding.
11. Dyspute.ai Terms of Service, effective 17 August 2026 — https://dyspute.ai/terms-of-service (grade C). Read the sections on legal advice, mediation privilege and dispute resolution.
12. Dyspute.ai news page — https://dyspute.ai/news (grade C). Read in full. Source for the accelerator, the prize, the beta date, AWS bootcamp and 2026 events.
13. Dyspute.ai blog: AI for Resolution, Not Lawyer Replacement: Dyspute vs. DoNotPay — https://dyspute.ai/blog/f/ai-for-resolution-not-lawyer-replacement-dyspute-vs-donotpay (grade C). The article body loads by script; read the title and the published summary only.
14. Dyspute.ai blog: The EU AI Act Just Changed: What It Means for AI Mediation — https://dyspute.ai/blog/f/the-eu-ai-act-just-changed-what-it-means-for-ai-mediation (grade C). The article body loads by script; read the title and the published summary only.
15. Dyspute.ai blog: FairClaims is Closed: Is Your Arbitration Clause Now a Liability? — https://dyspute.ai/blog/f/fairclaims-is-closed-is-your-arbitration-clause-now-a-liability (grade C). The article body loads by script; read the title and the published summary with the closing date.
16. Dyspute.ai blog: Dyspute.ai's AI Mediator Is Now Live, in Beta — https://dyspute.ai/blog/f/dysputeai%E2%80%99s-ai-mediator-is-now-live%E2%80%94in-beta (grade C). Read the title and the published summary; the news page gives the date.
17. Dyspute.ai blog: What Inspired Dyspute.ai? A Game-Changing Study — https://dyspute.ai/blog/f/what-inspired-dysputeai-a-game-changing-study (grade C). Read the published summary, written by the founder.
18. Database of failed startups, local export — /method/#dead (grade C). Local export. AI-written summaries, not independently verified. Source for the failed predecessors.

Contact: aiolum@livyden.com. Run Dyspute.ai? Send corrections or a verified figure to aiolum@livyden.com (subject: Correction: Dyspute.ai).